Oral formulations of deferasirox

ABSTRACT

Orally administerable deferasirox formulations are disclosed having reduced release under gastric conditions and fast release at near neutral pH or at neutral pH.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

Compositions and technologies of manufacturing medicaments for Exjade™(deferasirox) with high drug loading to potentially reduce variabilityof the gastric emptying, minimize food effect, prevent gastricirritation and also reduce the size and delivery route of the dosageform to improve patient compliance.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Exjade™ (deferasirox) is a marketed product from Novartis that isformulated as dispersible tablets in 125 mg, 250 mg and 500 mg dosestrengths. Exjade™ (deferasirox) is given once daily for the treatmentof chronic iron overload due to blood transfusions, which is referred toby medical professionals and clinicians as transfusional hemosiderosis,in patients 2 years of age and older.

Due to the poor solubility of Exjade™ (deferasirox), a high dose isrequired to achieve the desired therapeutic effect, which results inunwanted side effects, such as gastrointestinal (GI) irritation andkidney toxicity. The poor solubility of Exjade™ (deferasirox) alsopresents technical difficulties in developing pharmaceuticalformulations, as seen from the solubility profile summarized in Table 1.To meet the high dose requirement and reduce pill burden Exjade™(deferasirox) was developed as dispersible tablets with about 29.4% drugload. The disadvantage of this type of formulation is that the tabletshave to be dispersed in water or appropriate liquid, such as in orangejuice or apple juice and stirred until a fine suspension is obtainedprior to administration. Further, the dispersible tablets have to betaken at least 30 minutes before food.

TABLE 1 Exjade ™ (deferasirox) Solubility Profile pH Solubility (mg/ml)at 37 C. water 0.02 1 <0.01 2 <0.01 3 <0.01 4 <0.01 5 <0.01 7.5 0.167

Gastrointestinal (GI) irritation has been reported for patients usingthe current dispersible tablets. Upper gastrointestinal ulceration andhemorrhage has also been reported in patients, including children andadolescents. Multiple ulcers have been observed in some patients.Stomach bleeding is a severe side effect that occurs for patientscurrently under Exjade therapy because of acidity of Exjade™(deferasirox), and local accumulation of drug content. Therefore, it isdesirable to re-formulate an Exjade™ (deferasirox) dispersibleformulation to limit the direct contact of drug compound with stomachmucosa. It is further desirable to provide a high load deferasiroxformulation that has no food effect. For instance, as enteric coatedform or multi-particulate form where dosage form is emptied faster fromthe stomach. In addition, data from THALASSA (NTDT) study placebo arms(contains all components in Exjade™ dispersible tablets (except API)suggest that excipients in the marketed dispersible formulation couldcontribute to GI adverse effects (AE) profile of Exjade™.

The current invention describes formulated compositions and thecorresponding technology of manufacturing tablets for Exjade™(deferasirox) to prevent gastrointestinal irritation, having no foodeffect and improve patient compliance.

With aforementioned cumbersome in drug administration, it is alsodesirable to re-formulate the current dispersible Exjade™ (deferasirox)tablets into swallowable (ingestable, orally administerable) tablets andsachets, which increase the drug load by up to and greater than 100% ofthe current dispersible tablet and sachet per dose requiring less pillburden while maintaining equivalent pharmacokinetic profile, andconsequently the therapeutic outcome as compared to commerciallymarketed dispersible Exjade™ (deferasirox) tablets.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An aspect of the present invention provides a tablet for treatingdiseases which cause an excess of metal, such as iron, in a human oranimal body or are caused by an excess of metal in a human comprisingExjade™ (deferasirox) of the formula I:

or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof present in an amount offrom 45% to 60% by weight based on the total weight of the tablet, saidtablet having a reduced release under gastric conditions and fastrelease at near neutral pH or at neutral pH.

Typically, a drug product that shows faster dissolution will have a muchhigher exposure level when tested in humans. Surprisingly, in thecurrent case, Exjade™ (deferasirox) tablets formulated to have slowerrelease showed much higher bioavailability and no food effects whencompared with commercial dispersible tablets, which have a fasterdissolution rate but which exhibit significantly lower exposure levels.The characteristics of the new swallowable (ingestable, orallyadministerable) tablets and sachets, such as its disintegration time anddissolution are uniquely needed to reach the intended exposure levels.

Another aspect of the present invention provides a coated tabletcomprising (a) deferasirox or a pharmaceutically acceptable saltthereof, and (b) at least one pharmaceutically acceptable excipientsuitable for the preparation of tablets, wherein deferasirox or apharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof is present in an amount of from45% to 60% by weight based on the total weight of the tablet. Thetablets are optionally enteric coated.

Another aspect of the present invention provides a sachet comprising (a)deferasirox or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, and (b) atleast one pharmaceutically acceptable excipient suitable for thepreparation of sachets, wherein deferasirox or a pharmaceuticallyacceptable salt thereof is present in an amount of from 45% to 60% byweight based on the total weight of the sachet.

Another aspect of the present invention provides a coated deferasiroxtablet comprising:

(i) at least one filler in an amount of about to 10% to 40% by weightbased on the total weight of the tablet;

(ii) at least one disintegrant in an amount of about 1% to 10% in weightbased on the total weight of the tablet;

(iii) at least one binder in an amount of about 1% to 5% by weight basedon the total weight of the tablet;

(iv) at least one surfactant in an amount of about 0.0% to 2% by weightbased on the total weight of the tablet;

(v) at least one glidant in an amount of about 0.1% to 1% by weightbased on the total weight of the tablet;

(vi) at least one lubricant in an amount of less than about 0.1% to 2% %by weight based on the total weight of the tablet; and

(vii) a coating.

Another aspect of the present invention provides a process for thepreparation of a coated deferasirox tablet according to any one of thepreceding claims, which process comprises:

(i) mixing deferasirox or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof andat least one pharmaceutically acceptable excipient;

(ii) wet-granulating the mixture obtained in step (i) in a high sheargranulator followed by drying and screening to produce a granulate;

(iii) mixing the granulates obtained in step (ii) with at least onepharmaceutically acceptable excipient to form a mixture;

(iv) compressing the mixture obtained in step (iii) to form a tablet;and

(v) coating the tablet.

Yet another aspect of the present invention provides a process for thepreparation of a coated deferasirox tablet, comprising the steps of:

(i) mixing deferasirox or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and atleast one pharmaceutically acceptable excipient;

(ii) wet-granulating the mixture obtained in step (i) in a high sheargranulator;

(iii) extruding and spheronizing the wet granulates obtained in step(ii);

(iv) drying the extruded and spheronized pellets; and

(v) coating the pellets.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 depicts a flow chart showing the manufacturing process of coateddeferasirox tablets prepared by wet granulation.

FIG. 2 summarizes the dissolution profile of deferasirox from tabletsprepared by wet granulation.

FIG. 3 summarizes the dissolution profile of deferasirox from entericcoated tablets prepared by wet granulation.

FIG. 4 summmarizes the actual pharmacokinetic profiles of the commercialdeferasirox tablets as well as those prepared using wet granulationtechnique.

FIG. 5 summarizes the dissolution profile of deferasirox capsuleconsisting of pellets prepared by extrusion spheronization.

FIG. 6 summarizes the dissolution profile of deferasirox capsulesconsisting of enteric coated pellets prepared by extrusionspheronization.

FIG. 7A, FIG. 7B, and FIG. 7C summarizes deferasirox mean concentrationversus time profiles for the invented formulations.

FIG. 8 summarizes inter-subject varabilities in pharmokinetic parametersAUClast, AUCinf, and Cmax for the invented formulations.

FIG. 9 summarizes a deferasirox Cmax comparison in the inventedformulation versus commercially available formulation for healthyvolunteers.

FIG. 10 summarizes steady state deferasirox C2h values versus Cmax forthe invented formulation versus commercially available formulation.

FIG. 11 summarizes a scatterplot of deferasirox C2h for the inventedformulation on Day 1 versus percent change from baseline in serumcreatinine at Week 4.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The current commercial formulation of Exjade™ (deferasirox) is adispersible tablet. The current formulation is dosed under fasted statedue to a GI irritation issue. The new intended swallowable (ingestable,orally administerable) deferasirox tablets have an improved GIirritation AE profile due to a slower release profile and removal ofsodium lauryl sulfate and lactose from the dispersible formulation. Theinvented formulation allows for patient compliance, no food effects andreduced GI irritation as compared to the current marketed Exjade™(deferasirox) product.

The present invention provides a Exjade™ (deferasirox) formulationhaving a unique combination of excipients and a surfactant (e.g., apoloxamer) that are compatible with deferasirox at physiological pHenvironment. The invented formulation also possesses certain improved invitro characteristics.

The invented process allows for and contributes to the high deferasiroxloading. Wet granulation of the deferasirox active can be done with highdrug loading (40-80% by weight) and compressed into tablets for entericcoating to achieve a final deferasirox loading of about 45-60% byweight, preferably 56% by weight.

A suitable dose of deferasirox ranges from 90 to 360 mg, especially, 90mg, 180 mg, 360 mg unit dosage for film coated tablets and 100 to 400mg, especially, 100 mg, 200 mg, 400 mg unit dosage for granuleformulation filled into stick-packs. The dose of deferasiroxadministered to a patient depends on numerous factors such as weight ofpatient, the severity of symptom and the nature of any other drugs beingadministered. The current product of deferasirox is presented on themarket with three dosage strengths, 125 mg, 250 mg and 500 mg. Thepresent invention provides exemplary embodiments for manufacturingswallowable (ingestable, orally administerable) deferasirox tablets withdifferent dissolution profiles that correspond to commercial Exjade™(deferasirox) product From a human clinical study, the inventeddeferasirox formulation demonstrated higher bioavailability, as comparedto the previous marketed Exjade™ (deferasirox) formulation. Thereforethe therapeutic dose was adjusted accordingly to achieve comparablepharmacokinetic profile and similar therapeutic effect. In summary, theinvented formulation was developed with higher deferasirox loading andsuperior bioavailability. Lowering the dose will eventually improvepatient compliance.

In an exemplary embodiment, one or more pharmaceutically acceptableexcipients are present in the deferasirox dispersible tablets, includingbut not limited to conventionally used excipients: at least one filler,e.g., lactose, ethylcellulose, microcrystalline cellulose; at least onedisintegrant, e.g. cross-linked polyvinylpyrrolidinone, e.g.Crospovidone®; at least one binder, e.g. polyvinylpyridone,hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose; at least one surfactant, e.g. sodiumlaurylsulfate, poloxamer; at least one glidant, e.g. colloidal silicondioxide; and at least one lubricant, e.g. magnesium stearate.

In one embodiment, the deferasirox granules and film-coated tablets willinclude the following compendial excipients: microcrystalline cellulose,povidone, crospovidone, poloxamer 188, colloidal silicon dioxide, andmagnesium stearate. Opadry coating material (hypromellose, titaniumdioxide, polyethylene glycol, Macrogol, talc and FD&C blue #2/Indigocarminine aluminum lake (C.I. 7305, E132)) is used for the film-coatedtablets. Among the above excipients, only poloxamer 188 and the coatingmaterial represent new excipients for Exjade; lactose and sodium laurylsulphate would no longer be present.

Reference is made to the extensive literature on the subject for theseand other pharmaceutically acceptable excipients and proceduresmentioned herein, see in particular Handbook of PharmaceuticalExcipients, Third Edition, edited by Arthur H. Kibbe, AmericanPharmaceutical Association, Washington, USA and Pharmaceutical Press,London; and Lexikon der Hilfsstoffe für Pharmazie, Kosmetik andangrenzende Gebiete edited by H. P. Fiedler, 4th Edition, Editor Cantor,Aulendorf and earlier editions.

Suitable fillers according to the invention include but are not limitedto microcrystalline cellulose, including but not limited to Avicel™ PH102, PH 101.

Suitable disintegrants according to the invention include but are notrestricted to: maize starch, CMC-Ca, CMC-Na, microcrystalline cellulose,cross-linked polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), e.g. as known and commerciallyavailable under the trade names Crospovidone®, Polyplasdone®, availablecommercially from the ISP company, or Kollidon® XL, alginic acid, sodiumalginate and guar gum. In one embodiment, cross-linked PVP, e.g.Crospovidone® is used.

Suitableinders include but are not restricted to: starches, e.g. potato,wheat or corn starch, microcrystalline cellulose, e.g. products such asAvicel®, Filtrak®, Heweten® or Pharmacel®; hydroxypropyl cellulose,hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose, e.g.hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose-Type 2910 USP, hypromellose, andpolyvinylpyrrolidone, e.g. Povidone® K30 from BASF. In one embodiment,polyvinylpyrrolidone is used, most preferably PVP K 30™.

Suitable surfactants according to the invention include but are notrestricted to: sodium laurylsulfate, betain, quaternary ammonium salts,polysorbates, sorbitan erters and a poloxamer. In one embodiment, thesurfactant is a poloxamer, preferably Pluronic™ F68 grade.

Suitable glidants include but are not restricted to: silica; colloidalsilica, e.g. colloidal silica anhydrous, e.g. Aerosil® 200, magnesiumtrisilicate, powdered cellulose, starch and talc. Preferably, colloidalsilicon dioxide is used.

Suitable lubricants include but are not restricted to: Mg-, Al- orCa-stearate, PEG 4000-8000, talc, sodium benzoate, glyceryl mono fattyacid, e.g. having a molecular weight of from 200 to 800 Daltons, e.g.glyceryl monostearate (e.g. Danisco, UK), glyceryl dibehenate (e.g.CompritolATO888™, Gattefossé France), glyceryl palmito-stearic ester(e.g. Precirol™, Gattefosse France), polyoxyethylene glycol (PEG, BASF),hydrogenated cotton seed oil (Lubitrab™, Edward Mendell Co Inc), castorseed oil (Cutina™ HR, Henkel). In one embodiment, magnesium stearate isused.

Accordingly, in an exemplary embodiment, the present invention providesa tablet for treating diseases which cause an excess of metal, such asiron, in a human or animal body or are caused by an excess of metal in ahuman comprising Exjade™ (deferasirox) of the formula I:

or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof present in an amount offrom 45% to 60% by weight based on the total weight of the tablet wheresaid tablet having a reduced release under gastric conditions and fastrelease at near neutral pH or at neutral pH.

Typically, a drug product that shows faster dissolution will have a muchhigher exposure level when tested in humans. Surprisingly, in thecurrent case, Exjade™ (deferasirox) tablets formulated to have slowerrelease showed much higher bioavailability when compared with commercialdispersible tablets, which have a faster dissolution rate but whichexhibit significantly lower exposure levels. The characteristics of thenew swallowable (ingestable, orally administerable) tablets, such as itsdisintegration time and dissolution are uniquely needed to reach theintended exposure levels.

In a separate embodiment, the present invention provides a coated tabletcomprising (a) deferasirox or a pharmaceutically acceptable saltthereof, and (b) at least one pharmaceutically acceptable excipientsuitable for the preparation of tablets, wherein deferasirox or apharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof is present in an amount of from45% to 60% by weight based on the total weight of the tablet, whereinthe tablets are optionally enteric coated.

In a separate embodiment, the present invention provides a coateddeferasirox tablet comprising:

(i) at least one filler in an amount of about to 10% to 40% by weightbased on the total weight of the tablet;

(ii) at least one disintegrant in an amount of about 1% to 10% in weightbased on the total weight of the tablet;

(iii) at least one binder in an amount of about 1% to 5% by weight basedon the total weight of the tablet;

(iv) at least one surfactant in an amount of about 0.0% to 2% by weightbased on the total weight of the tablet;

(v) at least one glidant in an amount of about 0.1% to 1% by weightbased on the total weight of the tablet;

(vi) at least one lubricant in an amount of less than about 0.1% to 2% %by weight based on the total weight of the tablet; and

(vii) a coating, wherein the coating comprises a functional ornon-functional polymer.

A. Manufacturing of Tablets by Wet Granulation Process

According to one embodiment, the present invention provides a processfor the preparation of a coated deferasirox tablet according to any oneof the preceding claims, which process comprises:

(i) mixing deferasirox or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof andat least one pharmaceutically acceptable excipient;

(ii) wet-granulating the mixture obtained in step (i) in a high sheargranulator followed by drying and screening to produce a granulate;

(iii) mixing the granulates obtained in step (ii) with at least onepharmaceutically acceptable excipient to form a mixture;

(iv) compressing the mixture obtained in step (iii) to form a tablet;and

(v) coating the tablet, wherein the coating further comprises afunctional or non-functional polymer.

A flow chart showing the manufacturing process of coated deferasiroxtablets prepared by wet granulation is summarized in FIG. 1.

In accordance with the invented process, the wet granulation step isperformed using 40-80% by weight of deferasirox, a poorly soluble drugwith PVP K-30™ as a binding agent, Avicel™ PH 101 as a filler,crospovidone as a disintegrating agent and SLS or Poloxamer as asolubilizing agent. Water was used as granulation media. The granuleswere mixed with external excipients, e.g., Avicel™ PH102, crospovidone,Aerosil™ as glidant and magnesium stearate as an anti-sticking agent.The final granules were compressed into tablets and enterically coatedusing Acryl-EZE™ 93F, a Eudragit™ based polymer. The tablets has shownoptimal hardness, friability and disintegration time. The dissolutionprofile of the coated deferasirox tablet is bioequivalent to thecommercial Exjade (deferasirox) tablets, as shown in FIG. 2.

Furthermore, in a related embodiment, the present invention provides aformulation with a full enteric coating. The enteric coating comprisesOpydry® 03K19229 and Acryl-EZE™ was applied to a deferasirox tablet coreat level of 5-15% by weight gain. An addition of sub-coating, such asOpydry™ 03K19229, enhanced the effectiveness of enteric coating. Fullenteric protection is achieved after greater than 5% by weight gain. Nomajor impact on deferasirox drug release was observed for enteric-coateddeferasirox tablets after two hours acid treatment. Except for 10minutes of the delay initially, the deferasirox drug release profilesare comparable to commercial Exjade™ (deferasirox) product, as shown inFIG. 3.

In general, after reaching the small intestine, the enteric coatedtablets release the drug slowly. However, in the present invention, theuse of unique polymer, for example PVP, as binder produces fast releaseof drug without any significant lag time. This will be helpful forachieving bioequivalency of the formulation as compared to referenceproduct, which is a non-enteric dispersible tablet.

The medicament of the invention may be in any suitable form including,e.g. tablets, pellets, granules, multi-particulates, beads, mini-tabs,spherules, beadlets, microcapsules, milli-spheres, nano-capsules,micro-spheres, platelets or capsules depending upon the desired route ofdelivery.

An embodiment provides that the medicaments such as pellet andmicro-particulates are filled in capsules, caplets or the like for oraldelivery.

In another embodiment, the deferasirox medicament is packaged for use bythe patient or caregiver. For example, the medicament can be packaged ina foil or other suitable package and is suitable for mixing into a foodproduct (e.g. applesauce and other food vehicles) or into a drink forconsumption by a patient.

B. Manufacturing Multi-Particulates Using a Extrusion Spheronization

In a separate exemplary embodiment, the present invention provides aprocess for the preparation of a coated deferasirox tablet, whichcomprises the steps:

(i) mixing deferasirox or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and atleast one pharmaceutically acceptable excipient;

(ii) wet-granulating the mixture obtained in step (i) in a high sheargranulator;

(iii) extruding and spheronizing the wet granulates obtained in step(ii);

(iv) drying the extruded and spheronized pellets; and

(v) coating the pellets.

Accordingly, manufacturing deferasirox multi-particulates using afluidized process technique or other pelletization techniques includesbut is not limited to the following considerations:

a) Pre-wetting: Water is evenly distributed to the dry blend of drug andAvicel™ PH105 in a high shear granulator.b) Pelletization: The pre-wetted blend was pelletized by mechanical andgravitational forces acting on the blend while being processed. Moisture(water) was constantly applied. Once the pellets reached the desiredparticle size range, a small percentage of the dry blend (or excipientalone) was incorporated on the pellets to stop growth and smooth thepellet surface.c) Drying: The drying of the pellets was performed in a fluid-bedprocessor The pellets were dried to moisture content below 3% by weight.

The following examples illustrate aspects of the invention and are not alimitation on the present invention. Formulations for preparing tabletsare set out below. In one aspect the tablets are formulated utilizingenteric coatings.

Example 1: Enteric Coated Wet Granulated Deferasirox Tablets Comprisinga Surfactant, Sodium Lauryl Sulfate (SLS)

Granulation Ingredient Weight % (range) Internal phase Deferasirox55.97%   Avicel ™ PH 101/ 14.4% (5-25) 105 PVP K-30 ™ 2.25% (1-5)Crospovidone 2% (1-5) SLS 0.375% (0-1) External phase Dried Granules 75%Avicel ™ PH 102 18.5% (5-25) Crospovidone 5% (2-10) Aerosil ™ 0.5ranges% (0.1-1) Magnesium 1% (0.1-2) Stearate Subcoating Opadry ™ 1% (0-2)03K19229 Enteric coating Eudragit ™ (Acryl 7% (5-20) EZE 93F)

Example 2: Enteric Coated Wet Granulated Deferasirox Tablets Comprisinga Poloxamer (Pluronic™ F68 Grade)

Granulation Ingredient Weight % (range) Internal phase Deferasirox55.97%   Avicel ™ PH 101/ 14.4% (5-25) 105 HPMc ™ 3 cps 2.25% (1-5)Crospovidone 2% (1-5) Pluronic ™ 0.375% (0-1) External phase DriedGranules 75% Avicel ™ PH 102 18.5% (5-25) Crospovidone 5% (2-10)Aerosil ™ 0.5ranges % (0.1-1) Magnesium 1% (0.1-2) Stearate SubcoatingOpadry ™ 1% (0-2) 03K19229 Enteric coating Eudragit ™ (Acryl 7% (5-20)EZE ™ 93F)

Example 3: Composition of Deferasirox Pellets Manufactured byExtrusion-Spheronization Granulation

Ingredient Weight % (range) Deferasirox 60-80%  Avicel ™ PH 101/ 8-32%105 PVP K-30 ™ or  2-5% HPMC ™ 3 cps or HPC EXF ™ Crosspovidone    5%SLS/  1-2% Poloxamer ™ Enteric coating Eudragit ™ (Acryl 5-20% EZE ™93F)

Example 4: Composition of Deferasirox Pellets Manufactured by FluidizedTechnique

Granulation Ingredient Weight % ICL670 ™ 70-80% Avicel ™ PH 105 20-30%

The compositions of the present invention and manufacturing processesprovide coated tablets of Exjade (deferasirox) and thereby minimizelocal GI irritation. When compared to the dispersible Exjade(deferasirox) tablets having a 29.4% drug load, The present inventedmethods and corresponding invented improved deferasirox formulationsincrease the drug load for producing swallowable (ingestable)deferasirox tablets that improve patient compliance.

Example 5: Deferasirox Coated Tablets Prepared by Wet Granulation UsingNon-Functional Coating

Deferasirox Tablets: Invented doses Variant A % (w/w) mg/648 mg/324mg/162 Component (range) mg tab mg tab mg tab Deferasirox 55.56 360.00180.00 90.00 Microcrystalline cellulose 15.09 97.81 48.91 24.45 PH101 ™Microcrystalline cellulose 18.00 116.64 58.32 29.16 PH102 ™ Poly VinylPyrrolidone 2.25 14.58 7.29 3.65 K-30 ™ Crospovidone 7.00 45.36 22.6811.34 Pluronic ™ F68 0.10 0.65 0.32 0.16 Aerosil ™ 0.50 3.24 1.62 0.81Magnesium Stearate 1.50 9.72 4.86 2.43 Total 100.00 648.00 324.00 162.00Coating Opadry ™ Blue 3.00 19.44 9.72 4.86 Final tablet weight 103.00667.44 333.72 166.86

Invented Deferasirox Pediatric Granule Doses Variant A mg/720 mg/360mg/180 Component % (w/w) mg tab mg tab mg tab Deferasirox 55.56 400.00200.00 100.00 Microcrystalline cellulose 15.09 108.68 54.34 27.17PH101 ™ Microcrystalline cellulose 18.00 129.60 64.80 32.40 PH102 ™PolyVinyl Pyrrolidone 2.25 16.20 8.10 4.05 K-30 ™ Crospovidone 7.0050.40 25.20 12.60 Pluronic ™ F68 0.10 0.72 0.36 0.18 Aerosil ™ 0.50 3.601.80 0.90 Magnesium Stearate 1.50 10.80 5.40 2.70 Total 100.00 720.00360.00 180.00

Summary of Deferasirox Variants Used in Clinical Pharmokinetic (PK)Study Variant A Variant B Variant C Materials Qty (%) Qty (%) Qty (%)Deferasirox 55.56 55.56 54.08 Cellulose 15.09 14.19 13.82microcrystalline Crospovidone 7.00 7.0 6.81 Polyvinylpyrrolidone 2.252.25 2.19 K30 ™ Poloxamer ™ 188 0.10 1.00 0.97 Cellulose MKR ™ GRN 18.0018.00 17.52 Aerosil ™ 0.50 0.50 0.49 Magnesium stearate 1.50 1.50 1.46Eudragit ™ L 100-55 — — 2.17 Hypromellose 5 cps — — 0.11 Sodiumhydroxide — — 0.03 Triethyl citrate — — 0.28 Polysorbate ™ 80 — — 0.002Glycerol monostearate — — 0.06 Total weight (mg) 100.00 100.00 100.00Tablet properties Tooling 19 × 7.5 19 × 7.5 19 × 7.5 Ovaloid OvaloidOvaloid Mean weight (mg) 910.24 916.22 903.62 Compression force (kN)25.00 25.00 25.00 Mean hardness (N) 267.60 231.70 236.70 % friability0.00 0.02 0.11 Dissolution Time (DT, 3.42 5.45 6.45 min.) with discsMean thickness (mm) 6.96 6.86 6.92

Granule Size for Deferasirox Variant A Formulation Corresponding to aRepresentative Batch for a Pilot Phase

Water addition Bulk Tap Weight of granules on screens (g) Water time LODDensity Density Screen Size (mm) (%) (min) (%) (g/ml) (g/ml) 1.4 1.00.71 Clinical  5 Kg 26 7 0.49 0.65 0 7.4 17.1 Deferasirox Batch 0.00%7.39% 17.08% Pilot phase 20 Kg 26 7 0.47 0.66 0 0 3.7 DoE batch 0.00%0.00% 7.43% Weight of granules on screens (g) Screen Size (mm) Total 0.50.25 0.18 0.125 0.09 Pan (g or %) Clinical  5 Kg 10.9 14.3 7.1 10.6 9.423.3 100.1 Deferasirox Batch 10.89% 14.29% 7.09% 10.59% 9.39% 23.28%100.00% Pilot phase 20 Kg 7.6 9.2 5.2 6.3 5.1 12.7 49.8 DoE batch 15.26%18.47% 10.44% 12.65% 10.24% 25.50% 100.00%Patient Data from the clinical study are summarized in Table 2.

TABLE 2 PK results from deferasirox tablets prepared by wet granulationwith non-functional coating Cmax AUC A B C A B C 0501_00001 0.906 1.2390.112 0.891 1.339 0.276 0501_00008 1.576 1.897 1.554 1.624 1.449 1.4750501_00013 1.347 1.516 1.046 1.433 1.785 1.305 0501_00020 0.952 1.1531.202 0.943 1.087 1.154 0501_00023 1.727 1.225 1.765 1.567 0.974 1.5740501_00026 0.981 1.133 1.420 0.963 0.998 1.018 0501_00027 2.293 1.1222.477 1.015 0501_00031 1.820 2.482 1.664 2.031 3.152 2.060 0501_000351.778 1.517 1.672 1.246 1.015 1.249 0501_00038 1.412 1.858 1.350 1.6732.233 1.126 0501_00049 1.714 2.233 1.467 1.929 1.525 1.752 0501_000521.176 1.244 1.538 1.774 1.564 1.538 0501_00053 1.057 1.340 1.091 0.8941.269 1.138 0501_00054 0.781 0.769 0.369 0.791 0.789 0.380 0501_000551.652 1.326 1.380 2.039 1.094 2.672 0501_00075 1.317 1.268 1.380 1.0101.388 1.318 0501_00088 1.604 1.580 0.921 1.552 1.452 1.075 0501_000931.689 1.713 1.976 1.767 1.924 1.472 0501_00104 1.827 1.556 1.519 1.4891.360 1.495 0501_00107 1.352 1.060 0.725 1.370 1.357 0.614

The dissolution profile for clinical deferasirox variants A, B, and C(500 MG) is highlighted in Table 3.

TABLE 3 Dissolution data for Clinical Variants A, B, and C (500 mg).Geo-mean 90% CI Treatment ratio Lower Upper A: 500 mg tablet with 0.1%1.38 1.18 1.62 Pluronic ™ B: 500 mg tablet with 1.0% 1.43 1.22 1.67Pluronic ™ C: 500 mg tablet with 1.0% 1.15 0.99 1.35 Pluronic ™ +modified-release enteric coating

-   -   Data for C_(max) were comparable to those for AUC.    -   Median T_(max) (3-4 hrs) appeared to be similar with all        formulations.    -   Deferasirox PK was slightly less variable with variants A, and B        (CV 23-38%), and slightly more variable with variant C (CV        54-61%) as compared to a conventional marketed commercial        formulation (CV 31-49%).    -   PK data with the current formulation in this study were        consistent with data from previous studies.

Example 6 High Load Deferasirox Formulation No Food Effect Studies

Six clinical studies have been initiated with corresponding pharmacologystudies in healthy adult volunteers. Four studies have been completedand two studies are ongoing. In the initial clinical pharmacology studyfor variant selection (study 1), the tablet variant selected fordevelopment displayed suprabioavailability: both AUC and Cmax for theinvented deferasirox formulation were approximately 40% higher comparedto the current dispersible tablet (DT) at a single dose of 1500 mg.Therefore, the subsequent clinical pharmacology studies usedstrength-adjusted formulations (400 mg granules and 360 mg FCT to matchthe 500 mg DT), in line with EMA/618604/2008 Rev. 7, which states that“If suprabioavailability is found, development of a lower dosagestrength should be considered”.

Study 2 (pivotal study with FCT) and study 3 (pilot study with granules)both demonstrated fully equivalent exposure with an AUC_(last) ratio of100%. However, C_(max) did not meet the standard bioequivalence criteria(as summarized in Table 4): values were higher for bothstrength-adjusted formulations.The food effect study 4 (granules) showed overall equivalence of theadministration with a soft food (apple sauce or yogurt) or with alow-fat meal when compared to fasting intake with water. The exposureafter administration with a high-fat meal was close to the equivalencelimits of 80% to 125% for AUC_(last).

TABLE 4 Summary of pharmacokinetic comparisons for invented deferasiroxformulation deferasirox AUClast Cmax Study dose [mg] ratio ratio No. N(form) food (90% CI) (90% CI) Completed Studies 1 2 1500(F)/ fasted/1.38 (1.179- 1.39 (1.164- 0 1500(DT) fasted 1.620) 1.661) 2 3 1080(F)/fasted/ 1.00 (0.932- 1.30 (1.203- 2 1500(DT) fasted 1.078) 1.400) 3 21200(G)/ fasted/ 1.00 (0.915- 1.18 (1.050- 0 1500(DT) fasted 1.099)1.323) 4 2 1200(G)/ applesauce/ 0.996 (0.934- 0.972 (0.891- 4 1200(G)water 1.063) 1.061) 1200(G)/ yogurt/ 0.986 (0.924- 0.988 (0.905- 1200(G)water 1.052) 1.077) 2 1200(G)/ breakfast/ 0.917 (0.845- 0.887 (0.789- 41200(G) water 0.995) 0.997) 1200(G)/ high-fat 1.194 (1.099- 0.949(0.843- 1200(G) breakfast/ 1.298) 1.069) water Ongoing Studies (resultsexpected by December 2013) 5 1080(F)/ fed/ TBD TBD 1080(F) fasted 61200(G)/ fasted/ TBD TBD 1500(DT) fasted DT: dispersible tablets(current formulation); F: film-coated tablets; G: granules; N = numberof subjects. Study 3 also tested dose linearity (at 400 mg/800 mg/1200mg) for the granules. Values outside the equivalence limits [0.8-1.25]are highlighted in bold

The two remaining clinical pharmacology studies (to be conducted in2H2013) aim to confirm the comparative bioavailability results for thegranules, and to test the food effect for the FCT.

The new Exjade formulations represent a significant improvement inpatient care and support compliance with chelation therapy because ofthe improved pharmaceutical properties and because of the changes incomposition. These improvements are expected to provide for a positivebenefit risk due to the importance of compliance/adherence to chelationtherapy for patients with chronic iron overload aged 2 years and older:

-   -   a lower inter-subject variability in exposure (CV % geometric        mean in study F2102 for FCT and DT: AUC_(last) 39.2% vs 49.7%,        Cmax 27.5% vs 33.4%, respectively) and the absence of a        substantial food effect (study 4) suggest that the new        formulations achieve a more predictable dose-exposure        relationship in clinical practice.    -   the absence of a substantial food effect (study 4) which        obviates the requirement to take the drug on an empty stomach at        least 30 minutes before food and therefore allows patients more        convenience and flexibility in the scheduling and administration        of their daily dose.    -   a more palatable alternative to the currently approved        dispersion, particularly for elderly and pediatric patients (an        aspect that was investigated in one of the measures of the        currently approved Exjade EU PIP).    -   The currently approved Exjade tablet is formulated with sodium        lauryl sulphate, which may be associated with gastrointestinal        tract irritation. Exjade currently also contains lactose and so        is not recommended in patients with rare hereditary problems of        galactose intolerance, the Lapp lactase deficiency,        glucose-galactose malabsorption or severe lactase deficiency.        Novartis believes the exclusion of lactose and sodium lauryl        sulfate in the new formulations will improve the        gastrointestinal tolerability of the product. This is supported        by the recently completed one year study 2209 where NTDT        patients in the placebo arm, which contained the same excipients        as the currently marketed Exjade formulation, reported GI        adverse event rates that were comparable to the active treatment        arm (42.9% for placebo vs. 36.4% for Exjade 10 mg/kg).

While the 90% CI for Cmax with both the FCT (in the pivotal study 2) andthe granules (in the pilot study) were not fully contained within theequivalence limits of 80% to 125%, the observed differences in Cmax notclinically meaningful for the new formulations of this innovator drugbased on the following rationale:

-   -   total drug exposure (AUC) is the key parameter predicting safety        and efficacy of deferasirox; chelation efficacy for iron        chelators is commonly accepted to be related to AUC. In a        24-hour PK study following a single 35 mg/kg dose of oral        deferasirox that was published by Chirnomas et al (2009),        patients with inadequate response to deferasirox had        significantly lower systemic drug exposure compared with control        patients (P<0.00001). C_(max), volume of        distribution/bioavailability (Vd/F), and elimination half-life        (t(½)) were not different between the groups.    -   no effect on the QT interval (a typical C_(max)-related        toxicity) was observed in the thorough QT study (submitted with        the original application in 2005); in that study, healthy        volunteers (in whom exposure is higher than in iron-overloaded        patients) were given doses of up to 40 mg/kg in order to achieve        high Cmax levels    -   the range of Cmax values observed in previous healthy volunteer        studies with over 200 subjects is consistent with the range of        C_(max) values observed with the new formulations (see below)    -   a large amount of safety, efficacy and exposure data exist for        the current formulation (see below for details)    -   in previously submitted patient studies, only minor safety        findings such as nausea and headaches were noted at T_(max) (see        below for details)    -   a statistical analysis to correlate pharmacokinetic parameters        (Ctrough as a proxy of AUC, C2h as a proxy for Cmax) with renal        effects in the large, one year patient study A2409 indicates        that creatinine changes are more strongly correlated with AUC        than with Cmax (see below for details)    -   Exjade™ (deferasirox) is titrated based on efficacy and        tolerability: the recommended starting dose is 20 mg/kg/day,        with up-titration recommended in 5-10 mg/kg steps every 3-6        months. Therefore, patients would only be exposed to the highest        approved dose (40 mg/kg/day for the current formulation) after        an extended period of up-titration with confirmed tolerability    -   the absence of a significant food effect results in a lower risk        of increased exposure when the drug is taken with a meal. With        the currently approved DT formulation, ingestion of 20 mg/kg        with a high fat meal (previous study for commercially marketed        formulation) resulted in an average Cmax of 138 μM in healthy        volunteers, whereas dispersion in water (study 2120) resulted in        a lower Cmax of 71 μM in healthy volunteers. In the patient        study A0105F, exposure nearly doubled (to a variable extent)        when Exjade was given after a high-fat breakfast. No such effect        was observed with the new granule formulation (Table 4).

FIG. 7 summarizes mean concentration (μmol/L)-time profiles of the keypharmacokinetic results for studies 1 (non-strength-adjusted tabletcomparison), 2 (pivotal strength-adjusted FCT study), 3 (pilotstrength-adjusted granule study), and 4 (granule food-effect study).

Individual Cmax values from Study 2 and Study 3 are within the range ofhistorical Cmax values observed with the current commercially marketedDT formulation: FIG. 8 includes Cmax data from (1) previous CP studiesin healthy subjects given 20 mg/kg deferasirox DT, (2) FCT treatment inStudy 2, and (3) granule treatment in Study 3.

Clinical data has been generated and analyzed from a one-year,open-label, single arm, multi-center trial evaluating the efficacy andsafety of oral deferasirox formulation (20 mg/kg/day) in 1744 patientswith transfusion dependent iron overload; thalassemia, MDS, SCD, andrare anemias (Study 7). Study 7 used sparse PK sampling: in addition toefficacy and safety data, deferasirox PK data were collected in a largesub-group of patients (˜600) at pre-dose (Ctrough, a proxy for AUC) and2 hours post-dose (C2h; a proxy for Cmax) on day 1, week 12 and week 28.As shown in FIG. 9, the Cmax values for the new high load deferasiroxformulations at steady-state (predicted by a nonparametric superpositionapproach) in studies 2 and 3 lie within the range of observedsteady-state deferasirox C2h values with the current DT formulation. Ofnote, deferasirox exposure in healthy subjects is generally higher thanin iron-overloaded patients; in addition, the sampling time point inStudy 7 (C2h) underestimates Cmax (since deferasirox Tmax usually occursbetween 2 and 4 hours post-dose). Since clinical safety data wereassessed within this range of Cmax, it is unlikely that Cmax observedwith the new formulations would lead to additional safety issues.

Deferasirox Cmax values in healthy volunteers are generally higher thanin patients. Two healthy volunteer studies in the initial registrationpackage in 2005 were therefore reviewed for potential Cmax-relatedadverse events. In the thorough QT healthy volunteer study (which foundno effect of Exjade on the QT interval), 44 volunteers received Exjade™(deferasirox 40 mg/kg immediately after consumption of a high-fatbreakfast to maximize Cmax. Cmax averaged 256 μM (range 134-472 μM).Safety findings in these subjects were limited to GI symptoms(diarrhea/loose stools, flatulence, and nausea) in 18% of patients, andheadache and dizziness in one patient each (2%). In a study (arandomized crossover study in 28 healthy volunteers to evaluate thebioequivalence of a single 20 mg/kg dose of Exjade™ dispersed in fruitjuice or water), three HV subjects reported loose stools 2.5 to 5 hoursafter Exjade intake, each on two separate occasions, lasting for 5-30minutes.

In addition, a new analysis of creatinine and creatinine clearancechanges was performed to explore whether deferasirox-associated renalchanges are a function of peak exposure (Cmax) or of overall exposure(AUC). The analysis used data from the large multicenter study 7, inwhich Ctrough (a proxy of AUC) and deferasirox C2h (a proxy of Cmax) wascollected at multiple time points. Even though both PK parameterscorrelate with dose, the analyses summarized below indicate that renalfunctional changes are more closely associated with AUC than with Cmax.

Based on study 7 data, the relationship between PK parameters at steadystate (Ctrough and C2h) and serum creatinine was investigated by using alinear mixed model of log-transformed creatinine values (1990observations at week 12 and 28) with patient included in model as arandom effect. After log-transformation, baseline creatinine levels, C2hand Ctrough were included as predictors in the model. As shown in Table5, a far higher slope (estimate) was observed for log(C_(trough)) thanfor log(C2h), indicating a higher correlation with Ctrough (a proxy ofAUC) than with C2h (a proxy of C_(max)). For a 30% increase in C_(max)(as observed for the FCT), the serum creatinine ratio would be 1.0087(=1.3̂0.03287) with upper bound of the 95% CI of 1.0127 (with all otherfactors held constant). The potential of multicolinearity for log(C2h)and log(C_(trough)) was assessed in the statistical model describedabove and did not show any multicolinearity issue (Variance InflationFactor (VIF)=1.56 and condition index <30).

TABLE 5 Linear mixed effect model of percent change in serum creatininefor deferasirox formulations Standard T Parameter Estimate error valuePr > |t| Lower Upper Log(baseline 0.9593 0.01226 78.22 <0.0001 0.93910.9795 creatinine) Log(C2h) 0.03287 0.007786 4.22 <0.0001 0.020050.04569 Log(C_(trough)) 0.06504 0.004803 13.54 <0.0001 0.05713 0.07295

Day 1 C2h values did not predict the extent of creatinine changes atweek 4 (N=682): the slope of the linear regression between Day 1 C2h andpercent change in serum creatinine at week 4 was 0.03 (−0.01, 0.08),with a p-value of 0.22, and R-square <0.01, as summarized in FIG. 11.

There was no statistical difference in the rate of serum creatinineincreases (either >33% over baseline, or >33% over baseline and >ULN)between patients whose C2h value was below the median (56.5 μmol/L inthis analysis) and those whose C2h value was at or above the median,based on the Chi-square test in a population exposed to a dose ofapproximately 20 mg/kg (N=528; Table 6). A similar analysis wasperformed considering another classification for Day 1 C2h usingquartiles (<Q1; Q1-<median; median-<Q3; ≧Q3) and results led to the sameconclusion.

TABLE 6 Statistical analysis of C2h on day 1 versus notable serumcreatinine values at week 4 (dose range 17.5- 22.5 mg/kg) fordeferasirox formulation Day 1 C2h < Day 1 C2h ≧ Chi-square median (N =median (N = test 264); % (N) 264); % (N) p-value SCr increase >33%14.39% (38) 18.56% (49) 0.197 (NS) from baseline at week 4 SCrincrease >33%  5.68% (15)  7.58% (20) 0.382 (NS) from baseline and >ULNat week 4

A covariate analysis by an ordinal logistic regression model wasperformed to further elucidate the impact of each PK parameter on renalfunction, as summarized in Table 7. Ctrough had a strong impact oncreatinine clearance (CRCL) change in categories, but C2h had almost noimpact (p-value=0.994), after adjusting for Ctrough. A C2h increase by1.3-fold would provide an odds ratio (OR) of 0.999 (0.872; 1.146). Thissuggests that the new invented deferasirox formulations (comparable AUCbut higher Cmax than the current marketed formulation) would result in acomparable effect on renal function.

All analyses summarized in this section will be described in full detailin the registration dossiers for the FCT and the granules.

TABLE 7 Summary results of ordinal logistic regression model analysisbased on week 12 data OR* for a 2-fold OR* for a 30% Std Pr > increasein PK increase in PK Parameter Estimate error ChiSq parameter (95% CI)parameter (95% CI) Log(baseline −10.3474 0.6405 <0.0001 creatinineclearance) Log(C2h) −0.00203 0.2663 0.9939 0.999 (0.695, 0.999 (0.872;1.434) 1.146) Log(C_(trough)) 0.9346 0.1653 <0.0001 1.911 (1.527, 1.278(1.174; 2.393) 1.391) Response profile based on the following CrClCategories (with ordered value): 1: 90 ml/min or more (N = 766); 2: 60to <90 ml/min (N = 193); 3: 15 to <60 ml/min (N = 77); *OR: Odds Ratio

REFERENCES

-   Cappellini M D, Bejaoui M, Agaoglu L, et al (2007). Prospective    evaluation of patient-reported outcomes during treatment with    deferasirox or deferoxamine for iron overload in patients with    beta-thalassemia. Clin Ther 29:909-917.-   Chirnomas D, Smith A L, Braunstein J et al (2009): Deferasirox    pharmacokinetics in patients with adequate versus inadequate    response. Blood 114(19): 4009-13-   Mednick L M, Braunstein J, Neufeld E (2010) Oral chelation: Should    it be used with young children. Pediatr Blood Cancer 55:603-605-   Osborne R H, Lourenco R D, Dalton A, et al (2007). Quality of life    related to oral versus subcutaneous iron chelation: A time trade-off    study. Value Health 10:451-456.

It is understood that while the present invention has been described inconjunction with the detailed description thereof that the foregoingdescription is intended to illustrate and not limit the scope of theinvention, which is defined by the scope of the following claims. Otheraspects, advantages and modifications are within the scope of theclaims.

What is claimed:
 1. A dosage composition for oral Administrationcontaining deferasirox in an amount selected from the group consistingof 90 mg, 180 mg, and 360 mg, wherein the composition comprises (i) atleast one filler in a total amount of 10% to 40% by weight based ontotal weight of the composition; (ii) at least one disintegrant in atotal amount of 1% to 10% by weight based on the total weight of thecomposition; (iii) at least one binder in a total amount of 1% to 5% byweight based on the total weight of the composition; and, optionally,separate from the total weight of the composition; and, (iv) a coatingof the dosage composition.
 2. A dosage composition according to claim 1wherein, (i) filler is selected from the group consisting essentially ofmicrocrystalline cellulose, lactose, and ethylcellulose; (ii)disintegrant is selected from the group consisting essentially ofcross-linked polyvinylpyrrolidone (crospovidone), starch, CMC-Ca,CMC-Na, microcrystalline cellulose, alginic acid, sodium alginate, andguar gum; and, (iii) binder is selected from the group consistingessentially of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose,microcrystalline cellulose, hypromellose, and starch.
 3. A dosagecomposition for oral administration containing deferasirox in an amountselected from the group consisting of 90 mg, 180 mg, and 360 mg, whereinthe composition comprises microcrystalline cellulose in an amount of 1%to 55% by weight based on total weight of the dosage composition.
 4. Adosage composition according to claim 1 comprising, (i) at least onesurfactant in a total amount of 0.0% to 2% by weight based on the totalweight of the composition; and, (ii) at least one lubricant in a totalamount of less than 0.1% to 2% by weight based on the total weight ofthe composition.
 5. A dosage composition according to claim 4 wherein,(i) surfactant is selected from the group consisting essentially ofpoloxamer, sodium laurel sulfate, betain, quaternary ammonium salt,polysorbate, and sorbitan ester; and, (ii) lubricant is selected fromthe group consisting essentially of magnesium stearate, Al-stearate,Ca-stearate, PEG 4000-8000, talc, sodium benzoate, glyceryl mono fattyacid, glyceryl monostearate, glyceryl dibehenate, glycerylpalmito-stearic ester, polyoxyethylene glycol, hydrogenated cotton seedoil, and castor seed oil.
 6. A composition according to claim 4comprising, (i) about 0.1% surfactant; and, (ii) less than about 0.2%lubricant.
 7. A composition according to claim 5 comprising, (iv) about0.1% poloxamer; and, (vii) less than about 0.2% magnesium stearate
 8. Adosage composition for oral administration containing deferasirox in anamount selected from the group consisting of 90 mg, 180 mg, and 360 mg,wherein the composition comprises (i) at least one filler in a totalamount of about to 10% to 40% by weight based on the total weight of thecomposition; (ii) at least one disintegrant in a total amount of about1% to 10% by weight based on the total weight of the composition; (iii)at least one binder in a total amount of about 1% to 5% by weight basedon the total weight of the composition; (iv) at least one surfactant ina total amount of about 0.0% to 2% by weight based on the total weightof the composition; and, (v) at least one lubricant in a total amount ofless than about 0.1% to 2% by weight based on the total weight of thecomposition.